On 22/12/2022 11:39, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>
> On 21/12/22 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/12/2022 06:42, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>> On 20/12/22 16:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 20/12/2022 11:12, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
>>>>> J721s2 has two instances of 8 channel ADCs in MCU domain. Add DT nodes
>>>>> for 8 channel ADCs for J721s2 SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@xxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts | 14 +++++++
>>>>> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> index a7aa6cf08acd..67593aa69327 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721s2-common-proc-board.dts
>>>>> @@ -309,3 +309,17 @@ &mcu_mcan1 {
>>>>> pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_pins_default>;
>>>>> phys = <&transceiver2>;
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&tscadc0 {
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> + adc {
>>>>> + ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&tscadc1 {
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> + adc {
>>>>> + ti,adc-channels = <0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +};
>>>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>
>>>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>>>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>>>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>>>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>> Hi , I thought i did addressed the feedback since tscadc is just a
>>> wrapper node.
>>>
>>> The actual adc node is inside of tscadc node.
>> Read the feedback, from all emails.
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
>
> Hi , i have gone through all earlier mails but can't find anything else.
> Can you point out again whats the issue.
"And this is a v2? Or resend? Or something else?"
You miss proper versioning and changelog.
Additionally - I commented just before error in your patch. You must fix
it, not ignore it, even though I did not point it out before.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
