On 2022-12-20 10:52:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/12/2022 20:28, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2022-12-19 10:09:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 19/12/2022 10:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 16/12/2022 22:58, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>>> From: Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Document smmu-500 compatibility with the SM6125 SoC.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Wait, not entirely... no constraints for clocks and regs?
> >
> > Quite odd that there is no warning for my DT patch as it clearly
> > requires at least one clock...
Again, any idea why there's no warning for this DT mismatching minItems:
1 for clocks, clock-names and power-domains?
> > Irrespective of that downstream doesn't define any (nor power domains).
> > How should we proceed?
>
> Binding now has constraints for clocks so at least that should be added
> to your variant.
And that should be:
clock-names: false
clocks: false
power-domains: false
Because this board does declare have any, at least not when going off of
downstream DT?
- Marijn
