Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 16/12/2022 08:24, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

On 15.12.2022 20:04, Lux Aliaga wrote:
Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
the sm6125 platform.

Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Please include a changelog, I don't know what you changed and
what you didn't. Also, you sent 4 revisions in one day, not
letting others review it.


  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
index 7e25a4f85594..b64c5bc1452f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
@@ -508,6 +508,73 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@4784000 {
  			status = "disabled";
  		};
+ ufs_mem_hc: ufs@4804000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
+			reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
+			reg-names = "std", "ice";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
+			phy-names = "ufsphy";
+			lanes-per-direction = <1>;
+			#reset-cells = <1>;
+			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
+			reset-names = "rst";
+
+			clock-names = "core_clk",
+				      "bus_aggr_clk",
+				      "iface_clk",
+				      "core_clk_unipro",
+				      "ref_clk",
+				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "ice_core_clk";
+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
+				 <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
+			freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<37500000 150000000>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<0 0>,
+					<75000000 300000000>;
+
+			non-removable;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
+		ufs_mem_phy: phy@4807000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
Krzysztof asked you to add a SoC-specific compatible in v1.


+			reg = <0x04807000 0x1c4>;
+
+			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
+
+			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>, <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
+
+			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
+			reset-names = "ufsphy";
+
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges;
+
+			status = "disabled";
+
+			ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@4807400 {
+				reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
+				      <0x4807600 0x130>,
+				      <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
+				#phy-cells = <0>;
+			};
I believe this is deprecated. See [1].


Konrad

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221104092045.17410-1-johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m988f3fe3d83b76bac247aea2d9dac34f37728d65
I've looked into the documentation and this is only for the sc8280xp. This PHY is defined as it is for the msm8996 and derivatives.

--
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux