Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/tidss: Add IO CTRL and Power support for OLDI TX in am625

[Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 19/11/2022 19:30, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> The ctrl mmr module of the AM625 is different from the AM65X SoC. Thus
> the ctrl mmr registers that supported the OLDI TX power have become
> different in AM625 SoC.
>
> Add IO CTRL support and control the OLDI TX power for AM625.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@xxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c      | 55 ++++++++++++++++++------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc_regs.h | 37 +++++++++++-----
>   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> index 472226a83251..f26129fb1d8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c
> @@ -930,21 +930,52 @@ int dispc_vp_bus_check(struct dispc_device *dispc, u32 hw_videoport,
>   
>   static void dispc_oldi_tx_power(struct dispc_device *dispc, bool power)
>   {
> -	u32 val = power ? 0 : OLDI_PWRDN_TX;
> +	u32 val;
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON(!dispc->oldi_io_ctrl))
>   		return;
>   
> -	regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, OLDI_DAT0_IO_CTRL,
> -			   OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> -	regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, OLDI_DAT1_IO_CTRL,
> -			   OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> -	regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, OLDI_DAT2_IO_CTRL,
> -			   OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> -	regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, OLDI_DAT3_IO_CTRL,
> -			   OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> -	regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, OLDI_CLK_IO_CTRL,
> -			   OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +	if (dispc->feat->subrev == DISPC_AM65X) {
> +		val = power ? 0 : AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX;
> +
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM65X_OLDI_DAT0_IO_CTRL,
> +				   AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM65X_OLDI_DAT1_IO_CTRL,
> +				   AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM65X_OLDI_DAT2_IO_CTRL,
> +				   AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM65X_OLDI_DAT3_IO_CTRL,
> +				   AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM65X_OLDI_CLK_IO_CTRL,
> +				   AM65X_OLDI_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +
> +	} else if (dispc->feat->subrev == DISPC_AM625) {
> +		if (power) {
> +			switch (dispc->oldi_mode) {
> +			case OLDI_SINGLE_LINK_SINGLE_MODE:
> +				/* Power down OLDI TX 1 */
> +				val = AM625_OLDI1_PWRDN_TX;
> +				break;
> +
> +			case OLDI_SINGLE_LINK_CLONE_MODE:
> +			case OLDI_DUAL_LINK_MODE:
> +				/* No Power down */
> +				val = 0;
> +				break;
> +
> +			default:
> +				/* Power down both the OLDI TXes */
> +				val = AM625_OLDI0_PWRDN_TX | AM625_OLDI1_PWRDN_TX;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* Power down both the OLDI TXes */
> +			val = AM625_OLDI0_PWRDN_TX | AM625_OLDI1_PWRDN_TX;
> +		}
> +
> +		regmap_update_bits(dispc->oldi_io_ctrl, AM625_OLDI_PD_CTRL,
> +				   AM625_OLDI0_PWRDN_TX | AM625_OLDI1_PWRDN_TX, val);
> +	}
>   }
>   
>   static void dispc_set_num_datalines(struct dispc_device *dispc,
> @@ -2841,7 +2872,7 @@ int dispc_init(struct tidss_device *tidss)
>   		dispc->vp_data[i].gamma_table = gamma_table;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (feat->subrev == DISPC_AM65X) {
> +	if (feat->oldi_supported) {
>   		r = dispc_init_am65x_oldi_io_ctrl(dev, dispc);
>   		if (r)
>   			return r;

I think it makes more sense to test the SoC version here, rather than 
the generic "oldi_supported". And if the same function is used for 
am625, maybe rename the func to "_am6xx_".

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 Tomi