On 18/12/2022 20:00, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:42 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/12/2022 00:43, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> Beacon Embedded has an i.MX8M Plus development kit which consists
>>> of a SOM + baseboard. The SOM includes Bluetooth, WiFi, QSPI, eMMC,
>>> and one Ethernet PHY. The baseboard includes audio, HDMI, USB-C Dual
>>> Role port, USB Hub with five ports, a PCIe slot, and a second Ethernet
>>> PHY.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> V2: Fix whitespace, remove dead nodes, and fix some node and
>>> parameter names to address errors in 'make dt_binding_check'
>>
>> You still cannot check/test/build this DTS without Makefile.
>
> The lack of makefile was an honest mistake as I forgot to add it to my
> patch. I ran the make dt_binding_check and addressed many of the
> errors, but some of them are not unique to my board, because they were
> errors in the imx8mp.dtsi file. I addressed some of them by sending
> patches to fix some types in imx8mp.dtsi. I will make sure V3 has the
> makefile updated.
>
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-beacon-kit.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-beacon-kit.dts
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..70399f2419cf
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-beacon-kit.dts
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,549 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright 2022 Logic PD, Inc dba Beacon EmbeddedWorks
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +/dts-v1/;
>>> +
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/usb/pd.h>
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-imx8-pcie.h>
>>> +#include "imx8mp.dtsi"
>>> +#include "imx8mp-beacon-som.dtsi"
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + model = "Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8MPlus Development kit";
>>> + compatible = "beacon,imx8mp-beacon-kit", "fsl,imx8mp";
>>> +
>>> + aliases {
>>> + ethernet0 = &eqos;
>>> + ethernet1 = &fec;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + chosen {
>>> + stdout-path = &uart2;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + connector-1 {
>>> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
>>> + label = "USB-C";
>>> + data-role = "dual";
>>> +
>>> + ports {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + port@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + hs_ep: endpoint {
>>> + remote-endpoint = <&usb3_hs_ep>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + port@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + ss_ep: endpoint {
>>> + remote-endpoint = <&hd3ss3220_in_ep>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + gpio-keys {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-keys";
>>> + autorepeat;
>>> +
>>> + button-0 {
>>> + label = "btn0";
>>> + linux,code = <BTN_0>;
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 12 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW | GPIO_PULL_UP)>;
>>> + wakeup-source;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + button-1 {
>>> + label = "btn1";
>>> + linux,code = <BTN_1>;
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 13 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW | GPIO_PULL_UP)>;
>>> + wakeup-source;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + button-2 {
>>> + label = "btn2";
>>> + linux,code = <BTN_2>;
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 14 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW | GPIO_PULL_UP)>;
>>> + wakeup-source;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + button-3 {
>>> + label = "btn3";
>>> + linux,code = <BTN_3>;
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 15 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW | GPIO_PULL_UP)>;
>>> + wakeup-source;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + leds {
>>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>>> +
>>> + led0 {
>>
>> No improvements here.
> I forgot the git commit --amend so my patch was missing the changes,
> but my machine has the fix. Sorry about that.
>
>>
>>> + label = "gen_led0";
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + default-state = "off";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + led1 {
>>> + label = "gen_led1";
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + default-state = "off";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + led2 {
>>> + label = "gen_led2";
>>> + gpios = <&pca6416_1 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + default-state = "off";
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + led3 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_led3>;
>>> + label = "heartbeat";
>>> + gpios = <&gpio4 28 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + pcie0_refclk: pcie0-refclk {
>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>>> + clock-frequency = <100000000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "VSD_3V3";
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>>> + gpio = <&gpio2 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + startup-delay-us = <100>;
>>> + off-on-delay-us = <20000>;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + reg_usb1_host_vbus: regulator-usb1-vbus {
>>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>>> + regulator-name = "usb1_host_vbus";
>>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
>>> + gpio = <&pca6416_1 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>>> + enable-active-high;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&ecspi2 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi2>;
>>> + cs-gpios = <&gpio5 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + tpm: tpm@0 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_tpm>;
>>> + compatible = "infineon,slb9670";
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + reset-gpios = <&gpio4 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + spi-max-frequency = <18500000>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&fec {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fec>;
>>> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>>> + phy-handle = <ðphy1>;
>>> + phy-reset-gpios = <&gpio4 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>> + phy-reset-post-delay = <150>;
>>> + phy-reset-duration = <10>;
>>> + fsl,magic-packet;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + mdio {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + ethphy1: ethernet1-phy@3 {
>>> + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
>>> + reg = <3>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&flexcan1 {
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_flexcan1>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +&i2c2 {
>>> + clock-frequency = <384000>;
>>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c2>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + pca6416_3: gpio-i2c2@20 {
>>
>> No improvements.
>
> I am not sure what I am supposed to do here. I already have one node
> called "gpio@20" and as far as I know, I can't have duplicate nodes
> with the same name. I have the same GPIO expander with the same on a
> different i2c bus. Do you have a recommendation as to what name I
> should use so the names are unique?
>
>>
>>> + compatible = "nxp,pcal6416";
>>> + reg = <0x20>;
>>> + gpio-controller;
>>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio4>;
>>> + interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
>>> + interrupt-controller;
>>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&i2c3 {
>>> + /* Connected to USB Hub */
>>> + ptn5110: ptn5110@52 {
>>
>> No improvements ... I'll stop reviewing. No point if you do not intend
>> to apply the comments.
>
> I changed this node from tcpc to ptn5110 per your last comment, and it
> matches other boards that use this and
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml example
> uses ptn5110.
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-tcpci.txt just called it
> "ptn5110@50" .
My comment was that node name has to be generic. ptn5110 is not generic
but specific. I gave you reference to examples of generic names but in
other boards there are more examples how this could be named.
>
> imx8mm-evk.dtsi calls it "ptn5110: tcpc@50" so that's the example I
> followed. I am guessing it fails the build test because there isn't a
> yaml file for this driver.
>
> I wasn't intentionally ignoring your comments, and I honestly tried to
> catch them.
>
> If you let me know how you want me to proceed, I will do a V3.
I stopped reviewing. Implement all the comments but if something is not
clear, just ask for clarification.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
