On 12/18/22 19:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 18/12/2022 00:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 12/17/22 12:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[...]
+allOf:
+ - $ref: dma-controller.yaml#
+ - if:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ not:
I think "not:" goes just after "if:". Please double check that it's correct.
Anyway it is easier to have this without negation and you already
enumerate all variants (here and below).
About this part, I don't think that works. See this:
$ git grep -A 15 'imx2[38]-dma-apb[hx]' arch/ | grep
'\(imx2[38]-dma-apb[hx]\|dma-channels\)'
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx23-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi- dma-channels = <8>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx23-dma-apbx";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx23.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx28-dma-apbx";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi- dma-channels = <16>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6q-dma-apbh",
"fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-dma-apbh",
"fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx6q-dma-apbh",
"fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi: compatible = "fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh",
"fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi: compatible =
"fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh", "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi: compatible =
"fsl,imx7d-dma-apbh", "fsl,imx28-dma-apbh";
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi- dma-channels = <4>;
So I think what we have to do to validate that, is, say
default: 4
if does not match on 6q/6sx/7d/23-apbx/28-abbh/28-apbx then 8
if does not match on 6q/6sx/7d/23-apbh then 16
But if there is a better way to validate the above, please do tell.
Then your existing if:then: is also not correct because you require for
fsl,imx28-dma-apbh (as it is not in second if:then:) const:16. Just
don't require it.
So, shall I just drop the entire allOf: section ?
