Hi Jagan,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 06:37:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 23:53, Sebastian Reichel
> <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add board file for the RK3588 evaluation board. While the hardware
> > offers plenty of peripherals and connectivity this basic implementation
> > just handles things required to successfully boot Linux from eMMC,
> > connect via UART or Ethernet.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [rebase, update commit message, use EVB1 for SoC bringup]
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts | 165 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > index 8c15593c0ca4..12ed53de11eb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > @@ -72,3 +72,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3566-soquartz-cm4.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568-evb1-v10.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568-rock-3a.dtb
> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..46ea2daf5d6e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> > +#include "rk3588.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Rockchip RK3588 EVB1 V10 Board";
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-evb1-v10", "rockchip,rk3588";
> > +
> > + aliases {
> > + mmc0 = &sdhci;
> > + serial2 = &uart2;
> > + };
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + stdout-path = "serial2:1500000n8";
> > + };
> > +
> > + backlight: backlight {
> > + compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> > + brightness-levels = <
> > + 0 20 20 21 21 22 22 23
> > + 23 24 24 25 25 26 26 27
> > + 27 28 28 29 29 30 30 31
> > + 31 32 32 33 33 34 34 35
> > + 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39
> > + 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
> > + 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
> > + 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
> > + 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
> > + 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
> > + 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87
> > + 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
> > + 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103
> > + 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111
> > + 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
> > + 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
> > + 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
> > + 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
> > + 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151
> > + 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159
> > + 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
> > + 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175
> > + 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183
> > + 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191
> > + 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199
> > + 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207
> > + 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215
> > + 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223
> > + 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231
> > + 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239
> > + 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247
> > + 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255
> > + >;
> > + default-brightness-level = <200>;
> > +
> > + pwms = <&pwm2 0 25000 0>;
> > + power-supply = <&vcc12v_dcin>;
> > + };
>
> Do we really need this now? and brightness-levels need not be required
> to mention all.
It's my PWM test case, but removing brightness-levels and
default-brightness-level sounds fine to me. This can be
added once there is display support.
-- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
