On 13/12/2022 18:15, Han Xu wrote:
> Add this new device entry in the driver id table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Han Xu <han.xu@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - change chip info orders
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-i2c.c | 2 ++
> drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> index 98811e4e16bb..c3589c3084ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@
> #define FXLS8962AF_DEVICE_ID 0x62
> #define FXLS8964AF_DEVICE_ID 0x84
> #define FXLS8974CF_DEVICE_ID 0x86
> +#define FXLS8967AF_DEVICE_ID 0x87
>
> /* Raw temp channel offset */
> #define FXLS8962AF_TEMP_CENTER_VAL 25
> @@ -765,6 +766,12 @@ static const struct fxls8962af_chip_info fxls_chip_info_table[] = {
> .channels = fxls8962af_channels,
> .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(fxls8962af_channels),
> },
> + [fxls8967af] = {
> + .chip_id = FXLS8967AF_DEVICE_ID,
> + .name = "fxls8967af",
> + .channels = fxls8962af_channels,
> + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(fxls8962af_channels),
> + },
> [fxls8974cf] = {
> .chip_id = FXLS8974CF_DEVICE_ID,
> .name = "fxls8974cf",
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-i2c.c b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-i2c.c
> index 17dd56756ff9..a8944b255a28 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-i2c.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static int fxls8962af_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> static const struct i2c_device_id fxls8962af_id[] = {
> { "fxls8962af", fxls8962af },
> { "fxls8964af", fxls8964af },
> + { "fxls8967af", fxls8967af },
> { "fxls8974cf", fxls8974cf },
> {}
> };
> @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, fxls8962af_id);
> static const struct of_device_id fxls8962af_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "nxp,fxls8962af" },
> { .compatible = "nxp,fxls8964af" },
> + { .compatible = "nxp,fxls8967af" },
> { .compatible = "nxp,fxls8974cf" },
This is confusing. The I2C ID table has driver data, but OF ID table
hasn't. So are they compatible or not?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
