On 12/8/2022 4:35 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 09/12/2022 02:22, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 12/8/2022 4:11 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 09/12/2022 01:38, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
On 12/8/2022 3:33 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 09/12/2022 00:36, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
Add both data-lanes and link-frequencies property into endpoint
Changes in v7:
-- split yaml out of dtsi patch
-- link-frequencies from link rate to symbol rate
-- deprecation of old data-lanes property
Changes in v8:
-- correct Bjorn mail address to kernel.org
Changes in v10:
-- add menu item to data-lanes and link-frequecnis
Changes in v11:
-- add endpoint property at port@1
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>`
Applying: dt-bindings: msm/dp: add data-lanes and link-frequencies
property
.git/rebase-apply/patch:47: trailing whitespace.
.git/rebase-apply/patch:51: trailing whitespace.
Also the dt_binding_check fails with an error for this schema. And
after fixing the error in the schema I faced an example validation
error. Did you check that the schema is correct and that the
example validates against the schema?
yes, but i run "make dt_binding_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml"
at mu v5.15 branch since
I wouldn't ask you to post the log here. But I don't think that
either of the errors that I see here is related to 5.15 vs 6.1-rc.
In fact after applying this patch against 5.15 I saw the expected
failure:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
properties:required: ['port@0', 'port@1'] is not of type 'object',
'boolean'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
properties: 'required' should not be valid under {'$ref':
'#/definitions/json-schema-prop-names'}
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml:
ignoring, error in schema: properties: required
"make dt_binding_check" does not work at msm-next branch.
I went ahead and just checked.
`make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=display/msm` works cleanly
in msm-next and reports a single example-related warning in
msm-next-lumag. I pushed a patch to fix that warning (wich can
hopefully be picked up by Abhinav into msm-fixes). So you can assume
that both these branches have consistent error-free display/msm
schemas.
I have clean msm-next branch (without my data-lines yaml patch
applied) and run "make dt_binding_check
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml",
then I saw below error messages.
Have you run into this problem?
No.
Did you do anything to fix "older dtschema instance"?
I had run "pip3 install dtschema --upgrade" according Rob Herring response.
but it still shows same problem.
Please let know how can I fix this problem.
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o
LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc
sort: -:2: disorder: 2022.1
ERROR: dtschema minimum version is v2022.3
make[2]: *** [check_dtschema_version] Error 1
make[1]: *** [dt_binding_check] Error 2
make: *** [__sub-make] Error 2
This means that somewhere in your path you have an older dtschema
instance.
When you sent me a question regarding this error, I asked for the
additional info. You provided none. Instead you went on sending the
untested patch that doesn't work.
since i can not test it on msm-next so that I did test it at my v5-15
branch.
besides, i think i have to sent the whole series patches include this
one to address your new comments on other patch.
is this correct?
But I did not check trainiling whitespace this time.
---
.../bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 27
++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
index f2515af..2a7fdef8 100644
---
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ properties:
data-lanes:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
+ deprecated: true
minItems: 1
maxItems: 4
items:
@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ properties:
ports:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
+
properties:
port@0:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
@@ -105,6 +107,29 @@ properties:
$ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
description: Output endpoint of the controller
+ properties:
+ endpoint:
+ $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
+
+ properties:
+ remote-endpoint: true
PLease add empty lines between the property definitions
+ data-lanes:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
This is already a part of video-interfaces, so you don't need $ref
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 4
+ items:
+ maximum: 3
enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
+ link-frequencies:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-array
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 4
+ items:
+ maximum: 8100000000
I think we can have enum here too.
+
+ required:
+ - port@0
+ - port@1
+
required:
- compatible
- reg
@@ -193,6 +218,8 @@ examples:
reg = <1>;
endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&typec>;
+ data-lanes = <0 1>;
+ link-frequencies = /bits/ 64 <1620000000
2700000000 5400000000 8100000000>;
};
};
};
