Le Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 09:51:42AM -0600, Rob Herring a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 2:56 AM Corentin Labbe <clabbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The rk3399 has a crypto IP handled by the rk3288 crypto driver so adds a > > node for it. > > > > Tested-by Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > > index 92c2207e686c..4391aea25984 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > > @@ -582,6 +582,26 @@ saradc: saradc@ff100000 { > > status = "disabled"; > > }; > > > > + crypto0: crypto@ff8b0000 { > > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-crypto"; > > + reg = <0x0 0xff8b0000 0x0 0x4000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>; > > + clocks = <&cru HCLK_M_CRYPTO0>, <&cru HCLK_S_CRYPTO0>, <&cru SCLK_CRYPTO0>; > > + clock-names = "hclk_master", "hclk_slave", "sclk"; > > + resets = <&cru SRST_CRYPTO0>, <&cru SRST_CRYPTO0_S>, <&cru SRST_CRYPTO0_M>; > > + reset-names = "master", "lave", "crypto"; > > This doesn't match the binding: > > crypto@ff8b8000: reset-names:2: 'crypto-rst' was expected > crypto@ff8b0000: reset-names:2: 'crypto-rst' was expected > crypto@ff8b0000: reset-names:1: 'slave' was expected > Hello I will send a patch to fix that Regards