On 12.12.2022 10:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 10:15, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + qup_opp_table: opp-table-qup {
>>>>> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-75000000 {
>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <75000000>;
>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-100000000 {
>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <100000000>;
>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_svs>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + opp-128000000 {
>>>>> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <128000000>;
>>>>> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> memory@80000000 {
>>>> Sidenote: memory@ should be moved above opp-*, alphabetically
>>>>
>>>> For this:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> You sure? Because before there is already opp for cpu...
>> Which are called opp-table-cpuN and not cpuN-opp-table, 'm' comes
>> before 'o'.
>
> So you want to have broken order?
> opp-table-cpu
> memory
> opp-table-qup
> ?
>
> They are at least all together in my patch.
No, I meant:
memory
opp-table-cpu
opp-table-qup
Konrad
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
