On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:17:19PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thursday 30 October 2014 15:16:44 Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:59:36PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > The function will be used by the I2C core which can be compiled as a > > > module. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I think it makes sense if I take this via I2C to get the dependencies > > for the later patches right? > > It would be easier, yes. Oh, DT maintainers are not on CC. Then I can wait pretty long for an ack ;) Fixing that. > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/of/irq.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c > > > index 1471e0a223a5..0d7765807f49 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/of/irq.c > > > +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c > > > @@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ int of_irq_get(struct device_node *dev, int index) > > > > > > return irq_create_of_mapping(&oirq); > > > > > > } > > > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_irq_get); > > > > > > /** > > > > > > * of_irq_get_byname - Decode a node's IRQ and return it as a Linux irq > > > number > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
