On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 4:05 PM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/12/2022 15:29, Luca Weiss wrote: > > The code in ufs-qcom-ice.c needs the ICE reg to be named "ice". Add this > > in the bindings so the existing dts can validate successfully. > > > > Also sm8450 is using ICE since commit 276ee34a40c1 ("arm64: dts: qcom: > > sm8450: add Inline Crypto Engine registers and clock") so move the > > compatible to the correct if. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > (no cover subject) > > > > The only remaining validation issues I see is the following on sc8280xp-crd.dtb > > and sa8540p-ride.dtb: > > > > Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('required-opps', 'dma-coherent' were unexpected) > > > > Maybe someone who knows something about this can handle this? > > > > And the patch adding qcom,sm6115-ufshc hasn't been applied yet. > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > > index f2d6298d926c..58a2fb2c83c3 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml > > @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ allOf: > > - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc > > - qcom,sm8250-ufshc > > - qcom,sm8350-ufshc > > - - qcom,sm8450-ufshc > > then: > > properties: > > clocks: > > @@ -130,6 +129,7 @@ allOf: > > - qcom,sdm845-ufshc > > - qcom,sm6350-ufshc > > - qcom,sm8150-ufshc > > + - qcom,sm8450-ufshc > > then: > > properties: > > clocks: > > @@ -149,6 +149,12 @@ allOf: > > reg: > > minItems: 2 > > maxItems: 2 > > + reg-names: > > There are no reg-names in top-level, so it's surprising to see its > customized here. It seems no one ever documented that usage... >From what I can tell, from driver side all devices not using ICE don't need reg-names, only the "ice" reg is referenced by name in the driver. I didn't add it top-level because with only one reg I think we're not supposed to use reg-names, right? Regards Luca > > > + items: > > + - const: std > > + - const: ice > > + required: > > + - reg-names > > > > - if: > > properties: > > > > --- > > base-commit: f925116b24c0c42dc6d5ab5111c55fd7f74e8dc7 > > change-id: 20221209-dt-binding-ufs-2d7f64797ff2 > > > > Best regards, > > Best regards, > Krzysztof