On 08.12.22 17:40, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > + Arnd Arnd, have you seen this? We haven't heard anything from Shawn afaics, who normally would take care of a patch like this. Hence could you consider picking up the patch at the start of this thread (e.g. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221205152327.26881-1-francesco@xxxxxxxxxx/ ) and send it to Linus in the next 48 hours? It seems low-risk and fixes a regression introduced this cycle various people care about. That's why I'll likely ask Linus to consider picking this up directly before releasing 6.1, if I don't hear anything from you soon. But I'd prefer if the patch would go through at least somewhat the proper channels; alternatively a ACK from you to signal Linus "yeah, pick this up" would help as well. Ciao, Thorsten > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:51:24AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: >> marex@xxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:26:53 +0100: >>> On 12/5/22 16:23, Francesco Dolcini wrote: >>>> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This reverts commit 753395ea1e45c724150070b5785900b6a44bd5fb. >>>> >>>> It introduced a boot regression on colibri-imx7, and potentially any >>>> other i.MX7 boards with MTD partition list generated into the fdt by >>>> U-Boot. >>>> >>>> While the commit we are reverting here is not obviously wrong, it fixes >>>> only a dt binding checker warning that is non-functional, while it >>>> introduces a boot regression and there is no obvious fix ready. >>>> >>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Fixes: 753395ea1e45 ("ARM: dts: imx7: Fix NAND controller size-cells") >>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y4dgBTGNWpM6SQXI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221205144917.6514168a@xps-13/ >>>> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> [...] >>> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> [...] >>> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> >> [...] >> >> As discussed in the above links, boot is broken on imx7 Colibri boards, >> this revert was the most quick and straightforward fix we agreed upon >> with the hope (~ duty?) it would make it in v6.1. Any chance you could >> pick this up rapidly and forward it to Linus? Or should we involve >> him directly (Thorsten?). > > Hello Arnd, > FYI - see Miquel explanation above. > > Francesco >
