On 08.12.22 11:51, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> + Thorsten
>
> marex@xxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:26:53 +0100:
>
>> On 12/5/22 16:23, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>>> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This reverts commit 753395ea1e45c724150070b5785900b6a44bd5fb.
>>>
>>> It introduced a boot regression on colibri-imx7, and potentially any
>>> other i.MX7 boards with MTD partition list generated into the fdt by
>>> U-Boot.
>>>
>>> While the commit we are reverting here is not obviously wrong, it fixes
>>> only a dt binding checker warning that is non-functional, while it
>>> introduces a boot regression and there is no obvious fix ready.
>>>
>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Fixes: 753395ea1e45 ("ARM: dts: imx7: Fix NAND controller size-cells")
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y4dgBTGNWpM6SQXI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221205144917.6514168a@xps-13/
>>> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
> [...]
>
> As discussed in the above links, boot is broken on imx7 Colibri boards,
> this revert was the most quick and straightforward fix we agreed upon
> with the hope (~ duty?) it would make it in v6.1. Any chance you could
> pick this up rapidly and forward it to Linus? Or should we involve
> him directly (Thorsten?).
Asking Linus directly often is fine, if it's something urgent and the
maintainer that usually would handle a patch is MIA. But in this
particular case it's likely not the best strategy, as it seems
753395ea1e45 was merged via the ARM soc tree. In that case I'd say the
revert should ideally go through there as well, hence I'd suggest asking
those maintainers (e.g. Arnd and Olof) is the right move at this point
in time (would be something different if today was release day; but even
then it would be wise to have them involved).
Ciao, Thorsten
