On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 06:04:30PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 12:45:50PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> > Ocelot switches have the abilitiy to be used internally via
> > memory-mapped IO or externally via SPI or PCIe. This brings up issues
> > for documentation, where the same chip might be accessed internally in a
> > switchdev manner, or externally in a DSA configuration. This patch set
> > is perparation to bring DSA functionality to the VSC7512, utilizing as
> > much as possible with an almost identical VSC7514 chip.
> >
> > This patch set changed quite a bit from v2, so I'll omit the background
> > of how those sets came to be. Rob offered a lot of very useful guidance.
> > My thanks.
> >
> > At the end of the day, with this patch set, there should be a framework
> > to document Ocelot switches (and any switch) in scenarios where they can
> > be controlled internally (ethernet-switch) or externally (dsa-switch).
> >
> > ---
>
> This looks like a very clean implementation of what I had in mind
> (better than I could have done it). Sorry for not being able to help
> with the json-schema bits and thanks to Rob for doing so.
It seems like it worked out well. Thanks Rob for all the help on this!
>
> Would you mind adding one more patch at the beginning of the series
> which syncs the maintainers from the DSA (and now also ethernet-switch)
> dt-bindings with the MAINTAINERS file? That would mean removing Vivien
> (see commit 6ce3df596be2 ("MAINTAINERS: Move Vivien to CREDITS")) and
> adding myself. This is in principle such that you don't carry around a
> not-up-to-date list of maintainers when adding new schemas.
Yep. I'll get that in the next set.
>
> I don't know if we could do something about maintainer entries in
> schemas not becoming out of date w.r.t. the MAINTAINERS file.
Sounds like a nice feature. Maybe part of dt_binding_check / checkpatch?
I'm running out of hours in a day...
