On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:07:14PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 12/5/22 18:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > marex@xxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:26:53 +0100:
> > , it's not
> > complex to do, there are plenty of examples. This would be IMHO a
> > better step ahead rather than just a cell change. Anyway, I don't mind
> > reverting this once we've sorted this mess out and fixed U-Boot.
>
> Won't we still have issues with older bootloader versions which paste
> partitions directly into this &gpmi {} node, and which needs to be fixed up
> in the parser in the end ?
Yes, I think so. While I do agree on printk warning and deprecated
functions and use more modern and less problematic stuff, this should
not come at the cost of failing the boot on board using some old U-Boot
version.
Francesco
