On Thursday 30 October 2014 09:08:32 Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:35:56PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 30 October 2014 18:08:26 Huang Rui wrote: > > > It enables hibernation if the function is set in coreConsultant. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > > > > > > Something went wrong with the Signed-off-by lines here. > > You should never add someone else's Signed-off-by below yours. > > > > I took a brief look at the entire series and the patches all look good > > to me, but you have made the same mistake with the Signed-off-by > > multiple times. > > there are no mistakes, I just asked Huang to resend what I had on my > testing/next because it had not been sent to devicetree mailing list. > It's definitely a tricky question what the right Signed-off-by chain is in this case, I guess strictly speaking it could have been Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx> which could correctly track where the patches went, but it's also somewhat silly. I would probably just have dropped the second Signed-off-by, so that the last S-o-b in the patch matches the "From", as we expect. It's definitely good to know that Huang Rui was not faking your Signed-off-by but that you had actually provided it yourself. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
