[Note: this mail contains only information relevant for regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot. That's why I removed most recipients of the quoted mail and only left what looked like a mailing lists. These mails contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter out.] On 30.11.22 14:52, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > it looks like commit 753395ea1e45 ("ARM: dts: imx7: Fix NAND controller > size-cells"), that was backported to stable 6.0.10, introduce a boot > regression on colibri-imx7, at least. > [...] Thanks for the report. To be sure below issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 753395ea1e45 #regzbot title ARM: dts: imx7: Boot failure on iMX7 #regzbot ignore-activity This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also telling regzbot about it, as explained here: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/tracked-regression/ Reminder for developers: When fixing the issue, add 'Link:' tags pointing to the report (the mail this one replies to), as explained for in the Linux kernel's documentation; above webpage explains why this is important for tracked regressions. Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.