On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 02:09:37PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > Without being a Responsible Adult^TM for either SPI or DT, my preference > would be for simplifying the binding so that if your clk stuff doesn't > land for 6.2 the binding checks still work. Yes, please simplify the example.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
