On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/11/2022 15:39, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 06:11:13PM +0800, Owen Yang wrote: > > > >> Subject: [2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add DT for sc7280-herobrine-zombie > > > > Please in include a version number for versions >1. If my accounting is correct > > this is v3, so the next iteration should be v4. > > > > You mentioned earlier that you are using patman. Add the following tag to > > one of the patches in the series to get the version included in the subject: > > > > Series-version: 4 > > It is a bit surprise that this patch is a v4... because I do not > remember v1 and v2... and v3. And no wonder since I was not CC-ed :/ > > It still surprised me how many people just cannot use > scripts/get_maintainers.pl. Everywhere, in each company. There is a tool > which they claim to use but they don't... or they base their patches on > one year old kernel which is another surprise... I suspect in this case the patches were based on a downstream tree. Owen is probably newer to upstream kernel development, let's celebrate that more people/companies get involved and guide them towards the upstream way of doing things, which might not always be obvious to folks who are newer to this :)
