Hello Tony, On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [221122 13:28]: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:32:24PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Let's allow node numbering in decimal format too. > > > > > > Simple human-readable increments/IDs are usually decimal, hex is only for > > > addresses as noted by Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > Let's use an improved match suggested by Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> and improved a bit by Uwe Kleine-König > > > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > > > Cc: linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Which tree should this merged through? The obvious candidates are pwm, > > dt and omap. > > The dt folks usually queue the binding patches separately. fine, so I marked your series in the PWM patchwork as "handled-elsewhere". Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
