On 22/11/2022 05:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 03:08:38PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
Quoting Tomi Valkeinen (2022-11-17 12:25:45)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support for DU on r8a779g0, which is identical to DU on r8a779a0.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
index d003e8d9e7a2..b1761d4ec4e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
@@ -524,6 +524,27 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a779a0_info = {
.dsi_clk_mask = BIT(1) | BIT(0),
};
+static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a779g0_info = {
+ .gen = 3,
Given that this is the V4H ... I wonder if this should be bumped
already. I guess that has knock on effects through the driver though...
rcar_du_group_setup_didsr() would need to be fixed to test gen >= 3
instead of gen == 3. That seems to be the only problematic location. It
could thus fairly easily be done in v2, but we can also delay it.
Ok, I can fix that here.
Tomi