On 18/11/2022 15:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 18/11/2022 15:58, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 17/11/2022 13:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/11/2022 11:31, Abel Vesa wrote:
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Add nodes for pm8010 in separate dtsi file.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8010.dtsi | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8010.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8010.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8010.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0ea641e12209
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8010.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
Any reason why this is licensed BSD-3 clause? It's not a recommended
license (2 clause is). Same for other patches.
Probably a bad copy-paste from other existing files.
While checking, the majority of arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm*.dtsi uses BSD-3-Clause
so it seems this was done for quite a while now.
If it is derivative work (of upstrea, downstream), then you might have
to keep BSD-3. But if not, how about changing it to BSD-2?
It's definitely a derivative work from upstream pm*.dtsi files with BSD-3-Clause
licence.
Neil
Best regards,
Krzysztof
