On 21.11.2022 12:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 21/11/2022 11:58, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Some NVMEM cells may provide more than 1 value. An example can be base
MAC address that is used for calculating multiple MACs (for few
different devices). For specifying value to read phandle needs to be
used with an argument.
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This bit is required for moving forward with the
[PATCH v2 00/20] nvmem: core: introduce NVMEM layouts
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220901221857.2600340-1-michael@xxxxxxxx/
As pointed out by Rob #nvmem-cell-cells should be added to the dt-schema
and not a Linux binding:
Re: [PATCH v2 15/20] dt-bindings: nvmem: add YAML schema for the sl28 vpd layout
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220912192038.GA1661550-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/
sl28 is one example that needs #nvmem-cell-cells
u-boot,env is another one
Please let me know if I got this binding right at all.
---
dtschema/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 dtschema/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml
diff --git a/dtschema/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml b/dtschema/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dfa99b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dtschema/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
+$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-cell.yaml#";
+$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/base.yaml#";
Drop quotes from both.
+
+title: NVMEM Cell Common Properties
+description: "Schema for NVMEM cell devicetree bindings"
Drop quotes.
+maintainers:
+ - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ - Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+# always select the core schema
+select: true
+
+properties:
+ "#nvmem-cell-cells":
+ $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
Drop quotes.
Rest looks fine to me, except a bit funny cell-cell name, but that's
just life. :)
Bothers me a bit too, I was even thinking about renaming NVMEM cells to
NVMEM entries but I'm not sure if it's not too late for that.
We already have "nvmem-cells" and "nvmem-cell-names" properties so
adding "entries" not would be probably confusing.
+ description: >
+ Some NVMEM cells may consist of raw data that requires some extra
+ processing. They may provide more than 1 value.
+
+ Passing extra argument(s) allows selecting data to access.
+
+additionalProperties: true
