On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 10:43:22AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:38:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:12:42PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Originally as it was defined the legacy bindings the pcie_inbound_axi and
> > > pcie_aux clock names were supposed to be used in the fsl,imx6sx-pcie and
> > > fsl,imx8mq-pcie devices respectively. But the bindings conversion has been
> > > incorrectly so now the fourth clock name is defined as "pcie_inbound_axi
> > > for imx6sx-pcie, pcie_aux for imx8mq-pcie", which is completely wrong.
> > > Let's fix that by conditionally apply the clock-names constraints based on
> > > the compatible string content.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 751ca492f131 ("dt-bindings: PCI: imx6: convert the imx pcie controller to dtschema")
> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changelog v5:
> > > - This is a new patch added on the v5 release of the patchset.
> > >
> > > Changelog v7:
> > > - Move the allOf clause to the bottom of the bindings. (@Krzysztof)
> > > - Get back the names to the clock-names property and make sure the
> > > platform-specific name constraint is applied in the allOf clause.
> > > (@Rob)
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.yaml | 46 +++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > We have 2 patches doing the same thing:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221109002449.35936-1-marex@xxxxxxx/
>
> It seems to me that that patch does two things at a time:
> 1. Fixes invalid fourth clock-names entry.
> 2. Fixes the fsl,imx8mm-pcie device having the "pcie_aux" clock name
> required instead of "pcie_phy".
>
> My patch does only the first part. What about moving my patch to that
> series and converting the Marek' patch to being applicable on top of
> it and fixing the imx8mm part only? That seems reasonable.
BTW, if this patch is moved from here the series will fail the
dt_binding_check procedure.
-Sergey
>
> -Sergey
>
> >
> > Please hash out which one you all want. Both seem to have clock
> > warnings still...
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
