On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:58:24PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 08:07 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> >+ if (tx_active) {
> >+ if (i2s->tx_fifo_high < 256)
> >+ xtfpga_i2s_refill_fifo(i2s);
> >+ else
> >+ tasklet_hi_schedule(&i2s->refill_fifo);
> Maybe use threaded IRQs instead of IRQ + tasklet.
Is that going to play nicely with the fact that the interrupt can be
shared and the desire to (AFAICT) do NAPI style stuff with the interrupt
disabled for long periods?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
