The old property is supported. See "[PATCH v1 1/10]" ^^ (of_is_system_power_controller supports both properties...) 2014-10-28 5:34 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:26:52PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi >>> index a5446cb..ced4436 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-apalis.dtsi >>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ >>> #interrupt-cells = <2>; >>> interrupt-controller; >>> >>> - ti,system-power-controller; >>> + system-power-controller; >> >> this board is broken until this patch is applied. > > It should not. Supporting a new property in the tps65911 is fine, but > the old property must keep being supported to preserve DT > compatibility. If a change removing support for > "ti,system-power-controller" has landed in -next, then it should be > removed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
