On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 05:35:49PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Montag, den 27.10.2014, 16:26 +0000 schrieb Romain Perier: > > No longer use custom property to define poweroff capability, use the standard > > DT property instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c > > index 7612d89..a7faff2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c > > @@ -423,8 +423,7 @@ static struct tps65910_board *tps65910_parse_dt(struct i2c_client *client, > > > > board_info->irq = client->irq; > > board_info->irq_base = -1; > > - board_info->pm_off = of_property_read_bool(np, > > - "ti,system-power-controller"); > > + board_info->pm_off = of_is_system_power_controller(); > > > > return board_info; > > } > You are breaking compatibility with older DTs here. This is not > acceptable. > > You may change all in-tree DTs to use the new property and also patch > the driver to understand it, but you must make sure that the driver > still understands the old, custom property. And especially in this case > it isn't really hard to do. correct, it should be simple to hide that under of_is_system_power_controller() itself. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
