Hi Serge, > From: Serge Semin, Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 5:49 AM > > Currently the 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names' properties are defined > being too generic to really describe any actual IRQ interface. Moreover > the DW PCIe End-point devices are left with no IRQ signals. All of that > can be fixed by adding the IRQ-related properties to the common DW PCIe > DT-schemas in accordance with the hardware reference manual. The DW PCIe > common DT-schema will contain the generic properties definitions with just > a number of entries per property, while the DW PCIe RP/EP-specific schemas > will have the particular number of items and the generic resource names > listed. > > Note since there are DW PCI-based vendor-specific DT-bindings with the > custom names assigned to the same IRQ resources we have no much choice but > to add them to the generic DT-schemas in order to have the schemas being > applicable for such devices. These names are marked as vendor-specific and > should be avoided being used in new bindings in favor of the generic > names. > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Note without the next dtschema tool fix > > --- a/lib.py 2022-09-29 15:17:13.100033810 +0300 > +++ b/lib.py 2022-09-29 15:19:54.886172794 +0300 JFYI. git am command could not work correctly by this lib.py file: --- Applying: dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add interrupts/interrupt-names common properties error: lib.py: does not exist in index Patch failed at 0001 dt-bindings: PCI: dwc: Add interrupts/interrupt-names common properties --- If I used patch command and skipped the lib.py, it could apply this patch correctly. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
