On 2022-11-01 17:18:00, Luca Weiss wrote:
> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The PMI8950 features integrated peripherals like ADC, GPIO controller,
> MPPs and others.
>
> [luca@xxxxxxxxx: remove pm8950, style changes for 2022 standards, add wled]
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Pick up patch, and adjust as mentioned above sign-offs
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..32d27e2187e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi8950.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2019, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <kholk11@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> +
> +&spmi_bus {
> + pmic@2 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pmi8950", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> + reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + pmi8950_vadc: adc@3100 {
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-vadc";
> + reg = <0x3100>;
> + interrupts = <0x2 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> +
> + adc-chan@0 {
> + reg = <VADC_USBIN>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 4>;
> + label = "usbin";
I've previously sent a patch with labels in the node name instead [1],
what's the preferred way nowadays?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20220926190148.283805-4-marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> + };
> +
> + adc-chan@1 {
> + reg = <VADC_DCIN>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 4>;
> + label = "dcin";
> + };
> +
> + adc-chan@2 {
> + reg = <VADC_VCHG_SNS>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> + label = "vchg_sns";
Shall we use hyphens in labels (especially if using them as node names).
> + };
> +
> + adc-chan@9 {
> + reg = <VADC_REF_625MV>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> + label = "ref_625mv";
> + };
> +
> + adc-chan@a {
> + reg = <VADC_REF_1250MV>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> + label = "ref_1250v";
mv* :)
> + };
> +
> + adc-chan@d {
> + reg = <VADC_SPARE2>;
> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> + label = "chg_temp";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pmi8950_mpps: mpps@a000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pmi8950-mpp", "qcom,spmi-mpp";
> + reg = <0xa000>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pmi8950_mpps 0 0 4>;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + };
> +
> + pmi8950_gpio: gpio@c000 {
It seems more common to name this label plural pmi8950_gpioS?
> + compatible = "qcom,pmi8950-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
> + reg = <0xc000>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pmi8950_gpio 0 0 2>;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + pmic@3 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pmi8950", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
> + reg = <0x3 SPMI_USID>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + pmi8950_wled: leds@d800 {
> + compatible = "qcom,pmi8950-wled";
> + reg = <0xd800>, <0xd900>;
> + interrupts = <0x3 0xd8 0x02 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> + interrupt-names = "short";
> + label = "backlight";
Same question here about using the node name instead, and dropping the
label altogether.
- Marijn
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.38.1
>
