Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] mfd: tps65219: Add driver for TI TPS65219 PMIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 31/10/2022 12:00, Lee Jones wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2c1cf92e92ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h

+/**
+ * struct tps65219 - tps65219 sub-driver chip access routines
+ *
+ * Device data may be used to access the TPS65219 chip
+ *
+ * @dev MFD device
+ * @regmap Regmap for accessing the device registers
+ * @irq_data Regmap irq data used for the irq chip
+ * @nb notifier block for the restart handler
+ */

This header needs work.
I'm not sure to get your point here. Just something like below to match format or do you expect more:

/**
 * struct tps65219 - tps65219 sub-driver chip access routines
 *
 * Device data may be used to access the TPS65219 chip
 *
 * @dev: MFD device
 * @regmap: Regmap for accessing the device registers
 * @irq_data: Regmap irq data used for the irq chip
 * @nb: notifier block for the restart handler
 */


Can you try an compile with W=1 please.
This raise one warning on mfd:
drivers/mfd/tps65219.c:28:12: warning: ‘tps65219_soft_shutdown’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
   28 | static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
soft_shutdown has been validated and is used in TI baseline even if not hooked in upstream version further to this review:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220825150224.826258-5-msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx/

It was a TI requirement to implement it...
Let me know if you want me to remove this function or if we can keep it like this.




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux