On 03:02-20221101, Jayesh Choudhary wrote: > Drop RNG clock property as it is not controlled by rng-driver. Does'nt tell me what is the alternative? why is the hardware description not sufficient for control? https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/am65x_sr2/clocks.html#clocks-for-sa2-ul0-device Looks like a perfectly valid description - do we have a bug and firmware does'nt allow control here? > > Fixes: b366b2409c97 ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-am6: Add crypto accelarator node") > Signed-off-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > index 4005a73cfea9..e166d7b7e3a1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ rng: rng@4e10000 { > compatible = "inside-secure,safexcel-eip76"; > reg = <0x0 0x4e10000 0x0 0x7d>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > - clocks = <&k3_clks 136 1>; Does this mean that the crypto module's power-domains property should be dropped as well? > status = "disabled"; /* Used by OP-TEE */ > }; > }; > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
