On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Kunihiko Hayashi
<hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2022/10/29 4:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:49:20PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> >> The word "glue" is ambiguous for the controller node name. Should put
> >> "sata-controller" instead of "ahci-glue" on the controller node.
> >> And rename a phy node to "sata-phy".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> >> index a3cd45acea28..89b8b133777a 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
> > yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
> > yaml
> >> @@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ additionalProperties: false
> >>
> >> examples:
> >> - |
> >> - ahci-glue@65700000 {
> >> + sata-controller@65700000 {
> >
> > But is this really the SATA controller aka AHCI?
> >
> > In cases where we don't have a standardized name, I don't think it makes
> > sense changing node names from one non-standard name to another.
>
> I see. This can't be named generic, so this change will drop.
> And "sata-phy" in the same way.
I think sata-phy is fine. It may not be added, but usb3-phy or
pcie-phy are common already.
Rob
