On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 4:09 PM Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > To avoid cc-ing people to DTs they are not related, the get_maintainers.pl > > script was run on each patch individually. The cover-letter is at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221031091848.530938-1-pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx/ > I think Neil's question is the same as mine: is there a dt-bindings > (yaml schema) change for this as well? The idea is to alert people (or > let bots alert people) in future when adding a cache to a .dts{,i} > where the cache-level property is missing. There's not one, but it's something to look at adding. I'm not sure how we'd check for missing 'unified-cache' which is a common problem. The challenge here is a lot of what needs to be checked is based on the overall structure. This probably is better checked in dtc which is better suited to do cross node checks. Rob
