On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, PERIER Romain <romain.perier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > 2014-10-23 10:12 GMT+02:00 Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> This breaks DT ABI stability right? An existing device tree using ti,system-power-controller won't work anymore after this patch right? I don't think that's acceptable. >> > > This is why I converted all dts which use "ti,system-power-controller" > and tps65910/tps65911 to the new property (everything is in the > patches serie). However, with an existing dtb it will no longer work, > yes. > What do you suggest ? keep these two properties in the driver ? :/ > > I mean, this is a standardization, so all the corresponding dts must > be updated and rebuilt... Like when you change something in a > dt-binding, you should update and rebuilt the dts... I Don't compute. DT ABI stability rule: any DTB that worked with kernel x must also work with kernel x+1. It seems like this patch would break that rule. It's ok to manage new properties and to deprecate the use of older ones if it makes sense (and in this case it seems like it does). But the old property must still be handled for compatibility reasons. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
