Hi, On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 04:02:21PM +0200, saravanan sekar wrote: > On 24/10/22 15:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:28 PM Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The mfd cell devices name populated on sysfs entry is dynamically derived > > > from an auto instance which introduced a regression. As a result > > > mpc2629_charger driver failed to get adc channel because of iio consumer > > > name mismatch with the sysfs. > > > > > > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1/mp2629_adc.0.auto/ > > > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-1/mp2629_charger.1.auto/ > > > > > > Fixes: 466a62d7642f(mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match devices) > > > > Wrong Fixes tag format, moreover the fixes should be grouped at the > > beginning of the series, so it will be visible and splittable based on > > this property. > > Thanks for quick review Andy, I will correct fixes tag format and group all > the fixes beginning of series in v5. > > Thanks, > Saravanan Also the patch subject has incorrect prefix. It should be "mfd:" instead of "power: supply:". -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
