On 22-10-21, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Marco, > > On 10/20/2022 7:07 PM, Marco Felsch wrote: > > Hi Peng, > > > > On 22-10-20, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Enable uart1/3 ports for evk board. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts > > > index 2e29bb3c041c..366f709f8790 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dts > > > @@ -428,6 +428,15 @@ &snvs_pwrkey { > > > status = "okay"; > > > }; > > > +&uart1 { /* BT */ > > > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > > > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uart1>; > > > + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_UART1>; > > > + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX8MP_SYS_PLL1_80M>; > > > > I'm curious, what is the default parent and why is this wrong? For the > > already exisiting uart2 we don't do that. Same applies for uart3. > > The default parent is OSC_24M. The uart2 is for console, so 24M is ok. > As I recall, we met issue 24M not able to get higher baudrate. What did you mean by higher baudrate, is it everything > 115200? When the console baudrates can be fullfilled with the PLL1_80M as well wouldn't it be worth to fix the imx8mp.dtsi instead? Regards, Marco