On lun, ott 20, 2014 at 05:40:11 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > Am Montag, den 20.10.2014, 13:19 +0200 schrieb Carlo Caione: > > Hi Philipp, > > from the documentation and the sources I have, it seems that in the register > > together with the bits for resetting the ICs there are also bits for turning > > the ICs on and off. I really wanted to avoid create a new of_xlate function > > just to map the reset IDs to the correct bit in the register so I left the > > nr_resets to BITS_PER_LONG and I'm using the default of_xlate. > > This way I can also avoid to use obscure reset IDs to be remapped when I can > > use directly the bit number in the register as reset ID. > > I'm fine with reusing of_reset_simple_xlate and using the bit offsets as > reset control number. Do you already know what abstraction you'll choose > for the IC enable bits? (Are those clock gates, or maybe power domains?) > Hopefully the documentation you obtained will help to decide. Those are clock gates actually. Arnd suggested to add a driver for the entire block (resets and clock gates) so probably I need to dig deeper in the CCF. -- Carlo Caione -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
