Hi Hans, On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:24:50AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 7 ++++ > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts > index 9d669cdf..85e7194 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-olinuxino-micro.dts > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > /dts-v1/; > /include/ "sun7i-a20.dtsi" > /include/ "sunxi-common-regulators.dtsi" > +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> I'm just wondering... Weren't we supposed to switch all includes to the preprocessor syntax in such a case? Maybe to handle the case were the DTSIs would have to use some preprocessors macros that wouldn't be expanded in this case? -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
