On 17/10/2022 17:10, Richard Acayan wrote: >> Several devices like SM6350, SM8150 and SC7280 are actually compatible, >> so use one compatible fallback for all of them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml | 10 ++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml >> index 750b40c32213..0c2894498845 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,gpi.yaml >> @@ -20,12 +20,14 @@ properties: >> compatible: >> oneOf: >> - enum: >> - - qcom,sc7280-gpi-dma >> - qcom,sdm845-gpi-dma >> - qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma >> - - qcom,sm8350-gpi-dma >> - - qcom,sm8450-gpi-dma >> - > > If you don't want this empty line here, you can still ask for it to be removed > in the original patch. It doesn't look like it was applied yet. > Sure. Best regards, Krzysztof
