Le 21/10/2014 01:52, Joe Perches a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 02:28 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> On 19.10.2014 17:16, LABBE Corentin wrote:
>>> Add support for the Security System included in Allwinner SoC A20.
>>> The Security System is a hardware cryptographic accelerator that support AES/MD5/SHA1/DES/3DES/PRNG algorithms.
> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sunxi-ss-core.c b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sunxi-ss-core.c
> []
>>> + cr = clk_get_rate(ss->busclk);
>>> + if (cr >= cr_ahb)
>>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Clock bus %lu (%lu MHz) (must be >= %lu)\n",
>>> + cr, cr / 1000000, cr_ahb);
>>> + else
>>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Clock bus %lu (%lu MHz) (must be >= %lu)\n",
>>> + cr, cr / 1000000, cr_ahb);
>>
>> See next comment.
>>
>>> + cr = clk_get_rate(ss->ssclk);
>>> + if (cr <= cr_mod)
>>> + if (cr < cr_mod)
>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Clock ss %lu (%lu MHz) (must be <= %lu)\n",
>>> + cr, cr / 1000000, cr_mod);
>>> + else
>>> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Clock ss %lu (%lu MHz) (must be <= %lu)\n",
>>> + cr, cr / 1000000, cr_mod);
>>> + else
>>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Clock ss is at %lu (%lu MHz) (must be <= %lu)\n",
>>> + cr, cr / 1000000, cr_mod);
>>
>> The management of kernel log levels looks pretty strange. As far as I
>> understand there is no error on any clock rate, I'd recommend to keep
>> only one information message.
>
> And if not, please add some braces.
>
>> hash_init: initialize request context */
>>> +int sunxi_hash_init(struct ahash_request *areq)
>>> +{
>>> + const char *hash_type;
>>> + struct sunxi_req_ctx *op = ahash_request_ctx(areq);
>>> +
>>> + memset(op, 0, sizeof(struct sunxi_req_ctx));
>>> +
>>> + hash_type = crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm);
>>> +
>>> + if (strcmp(hash_type, "sha1") == 0)
>>> + op->mode = SS_OP_SHA1;
>>> + if (strcmp(hash_type, "md5") == 0)
>>> + op->mode = SS_OP_MD5;
>
> else if ?
>
>>> + if (op->mode == 0)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> maybe this?
>
> if (!strcmp(hash_type, "sha1"))
> op->mode = SS_OP_SHA1;
> else if (!strcmp(hash_type, "md5"))
> op->mode = SH_OP_MD5;
> else
> return -EINVAL;
>
Ok it is better
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
> []
>>> +int sunxi_hash_update(struct ahash_request *areq)
>>> +{
> []
>>> + dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%s %s bc=%llu len=%u mode=%x bw=%u ww=%u",
>>> + __func__, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm),
>>> + op->byte_count, areq->nbytes, op->mode,
>>> + op->nbw, op->nwait);
>
> dev_dbg statements generally don't need __func__ as
> dynamic_debug can add it.
>
> If you want to keep it, the most common output form for
> __func__ is '"%s: ...", __func__'
>
It is a big debug that I forgot to remove but I fixed that in other dev_dbg
thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
