On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:47:09AM -0700, Colin Foster wrote: > Thank you for laying this path out for me. Hopefully when I go > heads-down to implement this there won't be any gotchas. It seems pretty > straightforward. > > Maybe my only question would be where to send these patches. If these > can all go through net-next it seems like there'd be no issue when step > 8 (add 7512 documentation) comes along with this current patch set. > > Otherwise this sounds good. I'll switch to getting a patch set of steps > 1-7 as you suggest. I have some doubts whether it would be good to also merge net/dsa/mscc,ocelot.yaml (i.e. the NXP variants) into net/mscc,vsc7514-switch.yaml. A few "if" statements on compatible string which decide the format of "reg" and of "reg-names" should cover the differences. Not sure how the end result will look like.
