On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 12:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 30/09/2022 23:20, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On MDM9615 the PMICs are connected using SSBI devices, which do not have
> > any addressing scheme. Drop the unused unit ids from PMIC device nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
> > index b47c86412de2..bb17a57a2b90 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
> > @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ qcom,ssbi@500000 {
> > reg = <0x500000 0x1000>;
> > qcom,controller-type = "pmic-arbiter";
> >
> > - pmicintc: pmic@0 {
> > + pmicintc: pmic {
>
> I think several other platforms, also with PMIC over SSBI, have the same
> problem. If that's correct, can you fix them in the same patchset?
It was a part of my previous patchset, but yeah. Let's get it done in this one.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
