On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:09:21PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:36:04PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 1:12 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 05:19:29AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > > > > > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > > > > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. > > > > > Since this is a binding migration change I sent the patch expecting > > > this going into the devicetree kernel tree. So I just use the common > > > device tree change style 'dt-bindings: spi: migrate mt7621 text > > > bindings to YAML' as the subject. So I don't really understand what > > > you mean above, sorry. What is wrong with this subject? I submitted > > > this v3 [0] and I was told by Rob to resend it to you and the > > > linux-spi mail list also. > > > > Bindings mostly go through the subsystem rather than the DT tree. > > I thought when changes are only in the binding side DT tree was > preferred. Sorry for the inconvenience, then. Will take into account > your advice from now on. Sometimes they do, but that's more the exception. The ones from you I've picked up don't have a subsystem really or the subsystem maintainer isn't too active or doesn't pay much attention to DT only patches. Mark is responsive and pays some attention to binding patches, so he takes them. Rob
