On Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:49:59 AM Grant Likely wrote: > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:50 +0200 > , "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Friday, October 17, 2014 08:04:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On October 17, 2014 2:01:33 PM CEST, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > >Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, > > > >we > > > >now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully). > > > > > > Awesome, that was really fast. I'm currently on my way his me in > > > the train, replying from my phone, but it looks good now. I'll have a more > > > detailed look next week but I'm definitely happy to see this go in (to next > > > and 3.19) now, any details we still find can be fixed on top. > > > > > > > In > > > >short, if > > > >we are passed a struct fwnode_handle pointer, we can get from it to the > > > >appropriate device node pointer (either struct acpi_device or struct > > > >device_node) > > > >using container_of() after we've checked the type. This is needed for > > > >the code > > > >that needs to access child nodes of a device in case when they don't > > > >have > > > >struct device representations (whatever the reason). This has been > > > >suggested > > > >by Grant and pretty much everyone involved agrees that it's better that > > > >the > > > >alternatives presented so far. > > > > > > Yes, it's nice enough that I now take back all the objections I had for the > > > child accessory API. > > > > Cool, thanks! > > > > I've just refreshed the device-properties branch of the linux-pm.git tree > > and it contains the current material now (including a couple of build > > fixes reported by the autobuild robot in patches [02/12] and [09/12]). > > > > My plan is to merge this into the linux-next branch when 3.18-rc1 is out. > > Wait for my ack please, but I should be able to review it this weekend > or on Monday. I'm actually reviewing now, but I'm on a plane near the > end of the flight. As soon as I get on the ground SIGFAMILY will > interrupt me for a bit. :-) Sure, I won't be trying to push things that you don't like :-) Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
