On 27/09/2022 17:20, Robert Marko wrote:
>
> On 27. 09. 2022. 16:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/09/2022 16:01, Robert Marko wrote:
>>> On 26. 09. 2022. 09:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> When BLSPI1 (originally SPI0, later renamed in commit f82c48d46852
>>>> ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: correct QUP peripheral labels")) was added,
>>>> the device node lacked respective pin configuration assignment. It
>>>> used also blsp0_spi function but that was probably the same mistake as
>>>> naming it SPI0.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for making it confusing, but "blsp0_spi" is the correct function.
>>> Pinctrl driver and datasheets call functions blsp0-blps5, but usually in DT
>>> we call the nodes blsp1-blsp6.
>>>
>>> It would probably be better for me to rename the nodes to blsp0-5 instead.
>> OK, so instead I will add blsp0_spi to the bindings.
>
> Can you add blsp0_uart and blsp0_i2c as well?
> All 6 of the QUP-s have same features.
Sure
Best regards,
Krzysztof
