On 26/09/2022 16:57, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Montag, 26. September 2022 10:27:54 CEST Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 25/09/2022 22:21, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Node names for the channel are supposed to be adc-chan@REG.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi index e77602e9f95c..7ad573c7b4ac
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pma8084.dtsi
>>> @@ -64,22 +64,27 @@ pma8084_vadc: adc@3100 {
>>>
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>>>
>>> - die_temp {
>>> + adc-chan@8 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_DIE_TEMP>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> - ref_625mv {
>>> +
>>> + adc-chan@9 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_REF_625MV>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> - ref_1250v {
>>> +
>>> + adc-chan@10 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_REF_1250MV>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> - ref_buf_625mv {
>>> +
>>> + adc-chan@12 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_SPARE1>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> - ref_gnd {
>>> +
>>> + adc-chan@14 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_GND_REF>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> - ref_vdd {
>>> +
>>> + adc-chan@15 {
>>>
>>> reg = <VADC_VDD_VADC>;
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> };
>>
>> I don't see where this is required, bindings doesn't mandate this naming:
>>
>> patternProperties:
>>
>> "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$":
>
> They don't require the "adc-chan" part (although dt nodes are supposed to have
> common names and adc-chan is used for adc for that; and dt node names are not
> supposed to have underscores), but this validation error happens without this
> commit:
>
> <snip>/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084-ifc6540.dtb: pma8084@0: adc@3100:
> 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'die_temp', 'ref_1250v', 'ref_625mv',
> 'ref_buf_625mv', 'ref_gnd', 'ref_vdd' do not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 'die_temp', 'ref_1250v', 'ref_625mv', 'ref_buf_625mv', 'ref_gnd',
> 'ref_vdd' do not match any of the regexes: '^.*@[0-9a-f]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 'qcom,spmi-iadc' was expected
> From schema: <snip>/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-
> pmic.yaml
>
> So while e.g. ref-vdd@15 would also work, adc-chan@15 is more correct.
The commit msg is not precise here. What the nodes are missing is unit
address (required by VADC bindings) and replace of underscore (coding
style). I think bindings do not require the adc-chan and we could apply
here rule from DT spec that node name should reflect it's
purpose/function, so die-temp@xxxx could be fine. Other places use
already adc-chan, so consistency could be an argument. But anyway commit
msg is not really describing why you are doing this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
