On 25/09/2022 16:00, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>> + allOf:
>> + - $ref: "qcom,tlmm-common.yaml#/$defs/qcom-tlmm-state"
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + pins:
>> + pattern: "^gpio([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|10[0-9]|11[0-7])$"
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - function
>>
>
> Is it possible to place this into qcom,tlmm-common.yaml? If the pattern
> is only used to make "function" required for GPIOs, then it should not
> matter if it matches just the prefix ("^gpio") or the exact set of
> allowed GPIO numbers. The definition of the "pins" property will already
> take care of validating those.
Hm, very good idea.
>
> Or are there some Qcom SoCs where a GPIO without "function" is valid?
Quick look at drivers says there is no such case. I can try adding it to
common schema and look for errors.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
