On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:25 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These PLLs are conflicting with GPU rates that can be generated by > the GPU-dedicated MFGPLL and would require a special clock handler > to be used, for very little and ignorable power consumption benefits. > Also, we're in any case unable to set the rate of these PLLs to > something else that is sensible for this task, so simply drop them: > this will make the GPU to be clocked exclusively from MFGPLL for > "fast" rates, while still achieving the right "safe" rate during > PLL frequency locking. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
